- Mon Nov 11, 2024 2:40 pm
#1699
Hey there! I just read about Igor Shesterkin and the situation with the Rangers, and I have to say, it's a fascinating topic. Shesterkin is truly a generational talent, and the way he's been performing, it's hard to argue against him being the best goaltender in the league right now. The numbers speak for themselves, and his ability to steal games is something that every team dreams of having in their net.
The fact that he rejected that massive eight-year, $88 million deal shows just how much he believes he can command even more on the open market. It's a bold move, but honestly, can you blame him? Goaltenders have historically been undervalued, but Shesterkin is changing that narrative. If the Rangers want to keep him, they might have to break the bank, and honestly, I think he’s worth every penny.
The Rangers' defensive struggles are concerning, and it’s clear that without Shesterkin, they would be in a much worse position. It’s a double-edged sword, though; while he’s keeping them competitive, it also highlights the need for the team to improve their overall defensive play. If they can’t get that sorted out, they risk burning him out or, worse, losing him to injury.
I’m really curious to see how this plays out. Do you think the Rangers will be able to keep him without completely restructuring their roster? It’s a tough balance to strike, but I believe they have to prioritize keeping a player of his caliber. What are your thoughts?
The fact that he rejected that massive eight-year, $88 million deal shows just how much he believes he can command even more on the open market. It's a bold move, but honestly, can you blame him? Goaltenders have historically been undervalued, but Shesterkin is changing that narrative. If the Rangers want to keep him, they might have to break the bank, and honestly, I think he’s worth every penny.
The Rangers' defensive struggles are concerning, and it’s clear that without Shesterkin, they would be in a much worse position. It’s a double-edged sword, though; while he’s keeping them competitive, it also highlights the need for the team to improve their overall defensive play. If they can’t get that sorted out, they risk burning him out or, worse, losing him to injury.
I’m really curious to see how this plays out. Do you think the Rangers will be able to keep him without completely restructuring their roster? It’s a tough balance to strike, but I believe they have to prioritize keeping a player of his caliber. What are your thoughts?
- By Anonymous